Saturday, October 27, 2012

Love and Power: Relationship Dynamics in CITIZEN KANE


You just want to persuade people that you love them so much that they ought to love you back. You only want love on your own terms. Something to be played your way according to your own rules.”  

-- Jedediah Leland, Citizen Kane



I know, I know, this is quite a film to tackle in my first few posts on a new blog. But I just saw Citizen Kane for the first time last weekend with my family, and I can’t stop trying to figure it out. I have a couple of ideas, so this is the first in a two-post mini-series about the movie – one criticizing Kane, and the other defending him.    

This dialogue, preformed by the character Maurice Bernstein, is a small example of a big message that I got from the film on the recurring motifs of love, power, and identity. Bernstein relates the story about the woman with the white parasol with the implication that he loves her, in some way or another, despite having seen her for only a moment. His subsequent recollections of her image presumably extend beyond the facts of what he saw to include a fantasy woman, with a made-up personality. In his mind, Bernstein created a fictional character out of a glimpse of this person, and in doing so, he acquired complete control over her – she is his because he invented her – and, I will argue, that is the main reason why he derives pleasure from the thought of her.

This is just one interpretation of Bernstein’s story, and I know that it presumes a lot. But I believe it is a valid argument simply because this fantasy, with all the same promises of love and power, repeats itself time and time again throughout the film.

Kane’s own personal relationship, with ‘Singer’ Susan Alexander, around which the plot is centered, is a prime example. This marriage (his second) begins with a number of parallels to Bernstein’s experiences with the Woman-in-White. Kane meets Alexander for one night only, and has no chance to really get to know her. Additionally, Alexander herself arguably “didn’t see [Kane] at all” (to quote Bernstein), because she does not recognize his name and is unaware of his fame. Yet, much like Bernstein’s affection for the woman from the ferry, Kane is instantly in love with Alexander and he leaves his wife to marry her, instead. Because Kane has no way to know what this woman is really like, his newfound relationship with her is based completely on his imagination of her personality. This scenario creates an artificial dynamic in which Kane simultaneously has authority over and is in love with Alexander, because he created her.

Unfortunately, by indulging too fully in this fantasy, Kane eventually runs his very real relationship into the ground. He begins by using his status in the newspaper industry to propel her to fame as an opera singer, importantly because that is what he imagined she wanted. He ignores, however, any sign that she is displeased with the situation, until she attempts to commit suicide. This devastating turn of events forces Kane to realize that he is delusional: Alexander’s action is completely unexpected – that is, it is something Kane’s falsified image of his wife would never do. The incident shows Kane that he may be able to use his power to give his wife fame, but he is wrong, at least, in thinking that that is what she wanted. Furthermore, it also directly disrupts their relationship’s power dynamic by demonstrating, in a most alarming fashion, that Alexander is in complete control of her own body and soul, and she has the ability to choose whether to live or to die.

The steady disintegration of Kane’s relationship climaxes with a scene in a tent at a picnic function, which he supposedly hosts for his wife. She accuses him, however, of giving her only what he wants, and failing to consider her own needs (“the important things”) in the process. In an extraordinary demonstration of power, Kane slaps Alexander across the face. She responds with an expression of hatred and by ordering him not to apologize. What struck me (no pun intended), was that right outside the tent, guests at the picnic are bustling around, singing and socializing. This incredibly stark contrast illustrates the ease with which Kane is able to please his acquaintances, and highlights the fact that it requires much more unselfish consideration of another to please his spouse. Kane does not genuinely know or understand Alexander; he sees her how he wants to see her. This gives him both artificial power over her, as well as artificial love for her; and while he attempts to give her what he thinks she wants, his efforts are just as synthetic as his sentiments. In the end, Kane cannot actually possess Alexander, and she leaves him, toppling his falsified ideas about himself, herself, and their relationship to the ground.

No comments:

Post a Comment